 |
Stream The Wizard of Oz Online.
Movie Title: The Wizard of Oz The Wizard of Oz is available for streaming or downloading. |
Like most baby boomers, I’ve watched this film dozens of times in the past on broadcast TV, then VHS tape, then LaserDisc … but I had never actually SEEN “The Wizard of Oz” until this newly restored DVD came out. It’s an fantastic transfer. The sepia-tone Kansas sequences are startlingly involving and obvious, and the Technicolored world “Over the Rainbow” is truly graceful. I found myself fascinated by details I had never noticed before: the glittering corn stalks in the Scarecrow’s field; the mirror-like floors of the Emerald City; the polished buttons on the guardsmen’s uniforms. Incredibly, even the individual grains of red sand in the Witch’s hourglass stood out and glistened! All these minor-but-sumptuous visual details served to heighten the magical spell that the film has always woven, enhancing the performances, the myth, and the music.
The DVD extras are a mind-boggling embarrassment of riches. The “Making Of” documentary hosted by the incomparable Angela Lansbury is worth the designate of the DVD alone, but there’s so remarkable more: an international poster gallery, interviews with cast members, deleted scenes, production stills, radio clips, etc, etc. There’s enough material to hold even the most casual viewer fascinated for hours, and a correct Oz buff will be occupied for days!
If you only bought a DVD player to inspect this one disc, it would well be worth the expense. Treat yourself, and topple in fancy with this classic film again … for the first time.
I was objective critized for foisting off the following review of the 3-disk DVD station as a review of the novel Blu-ray. I didn’t; Amazon did. As anyone who’s been here for a while will watch, Amazon throws all DVD reviews into the same bucket, regardless of the edition. So don’t blame me.
Buy,Download, Or Stream The Wizard of Oz! Click Here
Buy,Download, Or Stream The Wizard of Oz! Click Here
I fair got the Blu-ray, and will have some comments on it at the slay.
Buy,Download, Or Stream The Wizard of Oz! Click Here
There’s no need to discuss “The Wizard of Oz” itself, a classic among classics (though I’ll have something to say about its “philosophy” later on) . You probably want to know whether the UltraResolution transfer justifies the assume.
It does. Oh, yes it does.
“The Wizard of Oz” has always looked obedient, one of the better Technicolor films. Unlike “Gone With the Wind”, which was generally gloomy and desaturated, and which UltraResolution greatly improved, I didn’t demand powerful enhancement for “Oz”.
Was I ever unfriendly. I stared with my jaw hanging begin. “Oz” is the best UltraResolution transfer by far — and the others were not exactly chopped liver.
The improvement in detail and sharpness is startling, especially as the modern prints did not seem obviously lacking in either. Even more fantastic is the expansion of the tonal scale. Dismal scenes (particularly those in the forest and outside the “witches” castle) are now filled with rich detail. Have you ever noticed how attractive the Winkies’ red, white, and gray uniforms are? I hadn’t — until now.
These enhancements combine make the biggest improvement of all — a major revelation of _texture_. The “feltiness” of many costumes is sure. The burlap of the Scarecrow’s face is now plainly visible, particularly in the close-up where he misstates the Pythagorean Theorem. And the Lion’s costume is a thick pile of fur you want to arrive out and stroke. You can notice every last strand of hair.
I’m exaggerating only slightly when I say the improvements of this UltraResolution transfer are not worthy less than those from cleaning the Sistine Chapel’s frescos. It’s as if layers of murk and grime — that you never even knew were there! — have been stripped away. Until you plan it, you cannot imagine what this film (that is, the novel camera negatives) _really_ looks like. It’s a shame the people who created “Oz” never got to explore it this draw.
The image quality is so high that I often felt as if I were looking through a window at live performers. (Well, almost.) No matter what versions you already have, you won’t be disappointed with this one. I watched it twice in two days, and I might even thought it a third time tonight.
My only quibble is that several matte paintings do not blend properly, because the hues at the join lines do not match those of the scene. This could have been fixed; I suspect it seemed too worthy work for a petite improvement. (A friend suggested that these sorts of things are left in because videophiles like finding them.)
As to the differences between the two- and three-disk sets… The latter includes a packet of fresh programs and promotional material of the sort we haven’t seen in 40 years ago. (Remember the 50-cent deluxe programs for road-show films? ) There’s also a region of 10 reproductions of Kodachrome publicity photographs. For this viewer, these extras alone elaborate the higher ticket.
The third disk will be of most interest to lovers of all things Oz. It includes a handsomely produced biography of L. Frank Baum (engrossing enough that you might want to peruse it more than once), plus all the restful Oz films and a Technicolor Oz cartoon. The existence of these is celebrated to anyone familiar with the history of Oz productions, but they’ve never appeared (as far as I know) in any home-video format.
The films are problematic. The two from Baum’s production company are the best — they have style, charm, and imagination. The others are cheesy ripoffs that believe tiny relation to the new book. The Larry Semon — a once wildly-popular but now virtually forgotten cartoonist and comical * — version is especially faulty, as it is slight more than a vehicle for Semon’s trace of physical comedy. The Baum estate is at least partly to blame — _any_ movie version must have seemed more radiant than none, especially as the technology to effect a convincing version of “Oz” would not exist for another 15 years.
The film’s opening titles praise the book’s “wonderful philosophy”, which seems to be either “You already have everything you need to be overjoyed”, or “The retort to your problems lies within yourself”. These are not so mighty “superb” as reflections of the hard-nosed “All your problems are your acquire fault” and “If you’re not a success, it’s because you’re indolent” homilies that grew out of the immense opportunity for personal development and material success this country offered.
I hold L. Frank Baum had something a bit different in mind. “The Wizard of Oz” is a fairy narrative in which magic has no bearing on the issues at the center of the myth. I acquire Baum wanted to discourage children from fantasizing that magic could be a solution to one’s problems.
So… he has the four principals obtain a grueling go to the Emerald City, then secure the wizard is a humbug. (What a shame the blander “deceptive”, “fraud”, or “phony” have replaced that scrumptious word.) He posesses no magic to supply wit, admire, or grit, which the Scarecrow, Tin Woodman, and Cowardly Lion have demonstrated they already have.
Baum’s “lawful” is simple — Admire, wisdom, and courage are what we need to gather through life. No one can _give_ them to us, because we _already_ acquire them, and all we need to do is roar them.
“Is that legal? ”
“That’s all it is.”
Now… the request you’ve been waiting for the retort to… Is the Blu-ray space worth the heed?
I viewed the Blu-ray on a Pioneer 60″ Pro Kuro, fed from a Sony BDP-S550. I also watched the DVD on the Pioneer (fed from the same Blu-ray player), and on a 36″ Sony 400-series WEGA “improved definition” TV (fed from a Sony DVP-S7000) .
The DVD remains a terrific DVD, and looks terrific on a high-quality 480i monitor. (View the preceding review.) It was, and tranquil is, a demo-quality DVD.
When played on the BD player, and upconverted to 1080p, the DVD’s image on the Kuro is stunning darn suited — the sharpness and detail are at least “acceptable”. But when you play the Blu-ray disk, the image goes from “acceptable” to almost-startling. Two examples… Label the enhanced detail and texture in the weather-beaten wood above the WWE’s insensible legs. And in the crowd scenes, you can peek (unprejudiced about) every Munchkin face. There is virtually no smearing of detail.
So… should you hasten moral out in a buying frenzy and net the BD edition? It depends.
The DVD is pleasurable enough for an gracious relate on a high-quality SD monitor. But even upconverted, it isn’t edifying enough for a _large_ HD prove. If you have, say, a 40″ display; your BD player has a superior upconverter (not all do) ; and you don’t sit “on top of” the conceal (as I do) ; you might gape runt inequity between the DVD and the Blu-ray.
But if you’re a video fuss-budget (as I am) and sit closer than the “experts” recommend (why _shouldn’t_ you? ), you will almost certainly remove the Blu-ray. It’s your call.
A few remarks on the extras… The wristwatch, as the kid in the Ally bank commercial says, is a fraction of junk. The effect shows no particular style, wit, or imagination. And as others have said, “The Dreamer of OZ” is a downhearted transfer, very badly unpconverted to 1080. It is not of acceptable quality, and should have been save on the DVD disk.
I will reach aid later (I hope) with some more comments on the sound and the other extras. Forcing yourself to repeatedly examine big chunks of a movie, regardless of its quality, is an ennervating experience.
solar electric shingles
American standard champion 4 toilet